https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/06/opinion/guns-conceal-carry-reciprocity.html?emc=edit_th_20171207&nl=todaysheadlines&nlid=59914923
By Gail Collins, Dec. 6, 2017
Hey, there are a lot of big movies opening up this month. One is a “Star Wars” installment and another involves Matt Damon becoming five inches tall.
I am mentioning this just to prepare you for a short discussion of gun laws. There’s been another big vote in Congress, and attention must be paid. But I promise to break up the story with totally unrelated cheerful information whenever possible.
First, the news: On Wednesday, the House of Representatives passed a bill that would make it impossible for states to do anything about people who carry in guns from other states.
We have seen this idea, known as “concealed carry reciprocity,” before. It basically says gun owners only have to follow the laws of the state they hail from. Some states will give a permit to carry a concealed weapon to an 18-year-old. Some don’t care about a record of stalking. Some don’t have any rules at all — you’re O.K. to pack a pistol if you can breathe.
“The Republicans yell states’ rights all the time, but they’re hypocrites,” said Representative Jerrold Nadler of New York. He claimed, in a phone interview, that the last time Congress passed a bill to impose the laws of one state on a different state “it was the Fugitive Slave Act.” We can look forward to more of this discussion since Nadler is now the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee. It used to be John Conyers, but then there was that sexual harassment matter.
Did you know “Top Chef” is coming back to TV this week? Perhaps you’re tired of reality cooking contests. But imagine how relaxing it could be to spend an entire hour in a world where the worst possible thing that could happen involves under-seasoning.
The gun bill’s Republican handlers refused to permit an amendment banning bump stocks. Those are the devices that were used by the gunman who killed 58 people in Las Vegas. But you knew that, right? We now live in a country where average people know what’s required if you want to make an assault rifle work like a machine gun.
The concealed-carry bill is also now chained to another measure aimed at making background checks more efficient. This modest, bipartisan plan came up after the Texas church shooting, when it turned out the gunman had a criminal background that should have precluded him from buying firearms.
The Senate, which really likes the background check bill, is going to have to take the two of them up together. “A cynical ploy,” said Senator Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, one of the co-sponsors.
This year a Brussels griffon named Newton won the National Dog Show. His handler said he likes ice cream and is “happy all the time.”
Blumenthal thinks the Senate Democrats can separate the two ideas, kill the concealed-carry bill and send the good background check plan back to the House for passage. This sounds promising, except for the part where it depends on the House Republican leadership taking a principled stand.
On Wednesday, those leaders had everything well under control. So there was no suspense whatsoever and the gun debate took place in a near-empty House, with a half-dozen people hanging around waiting for their turn to say something … inevitable. Democrats decried the fact that the Republicans didn’t want to work together. Republicans said carrying a gun made you safer.
Liz Cheney of Wyoming declared the right to carry a concealed weapon is “God given.” We will not pursue the question of What Would Jesus Pack.
American Airlines, which accidentally gave its pilots Christmas vacation, has worked out a deal so there will actually be people available to fly the planes.
Representative Doug Collins, a Georgia Republican who was in charge of getting the gun bill through the House, expressed dismay at the tenor of the debate, such as it was. “Shame on us,” he said.
Collins seemed particularly offended when a Democrat called him a “puppet” of the National Rifle Association. Which seems a little impolite, if reasonably accurate. However, Collins did refer to the opposition as “a group who enjoys killing babies.”
A family in Florida says a cat saved their kids from a rattlesnake. The cat’s name is Oreo and he is recovering from a nasty bite.
The Democrats complained that there were much better ways for the House to spend its time. Representative Alcee Hastings of Florida — home of Oreo! — suggested that instead of trying to mess with the states’ right to do their own gun regulations, the members should be working on preventing a government shutdown. Which is right around the corner.
Actually, it could come on Saturday. Followed by the deportation of 800,000 Dreamers, who were brought to the country illegally as children.
And did you know the queen of England has invited Prince Harry’s new fiancée to Christmas dinner? This is highly unusual, but that Meghan Markle is so nice.
Showing posts with label gun control. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gun control. Show all posts
A Pistol for Every Bar Stool - Gail Collins
JUNE 16, 2016
The nation hasn’t exactly joined hands
in a united response to the Orlando massacre. But since this terrible mass
shooting happened in one of the most weapons-friendly places in the country,
maybe we can at least all agree that having wildly permissive gun laws does not
make a city safer.
O.K., probably not.
On Wednesday, Donald Trump took time out
from vilifying Muslims and put some of the blame on gun control. If the patrons
of Pulse, the gay bar in Orlando, had been carrying concealed weapons, he said,
they could have taken control of the situation. The gunman would have been
“just open target practice.”
(This was at the same speech where he
congratulated himself for his stupendous relationship with the gay community,
suggesting he didn’t “get enough credit” for having a club in Palm Beach that
was “open to everybody.” This is a little off our topic today, but I have to
once again point out that Trump’s club is open to everybody with $100,000 to
cover the membership fee.)
But about guns. Let’s follow Trump’s
thought. It’s easy to buy a gun in Florida and supereasy to get a permit to
carry around a concealed weapon. Even the Florida Legislature, however, doesn’t
allow people to carry guns into bars. Trump did not specifically say that we
need to uphold Americans’ freedom to drink while armed. But there doesn’t seem
to be any other way to interpret his argument.
Also, there actually was an off-duty
police officer working in the club who tried to shoot the gunman but failed.
This is important, because the myth of the cool and steady shooter is one of
the most cherished beliefs of the National Rifle Association and its
supporters. Trump himself has bragged that if he’d been in Paris on the night
of the attacks there, he would have shot the terrorists. (“I may have been
killed, but I would have drawn.”)
This is an excellent example of
delusional gun thinking. Although Trump frequently reminds us he has a permit
to carry a gun, there’s no indication he’s ever done so. And there’s certainly
no evidence whatsoever that he has any skill in hitting things.
It’s very, very difficult to draw, aim
and shoot accurately when you’re under severe stress. It’s one of the reasons
that police officers so often spray fleeing suspects with bullets. They can’t
hit a moving target, even though they get far more weapons training than your
normal armed civilian.
In Florida, people who want to carry a
gun merely have to be able to demonstrate they can “safely handle and discharge
the firearm.” Nowhere does it say anything about accuracy.
A few weeks ago in Houston, a
25-year-old Afghan war veteran named Dionisio Garza walked up to a stranger
sitting in a car at a carwash and shot him in the neck while railing about
“homosexuals, Jews and Walmart,” according to local reports. He fired off 212
rounds, mostly from an assault rifle, hitting a police helicopter and a nearby
gas station, which burst into flames. The police said a neighbor who heard the
shooting came running with a gun, but was shot himself.
People who hear this story may draw
different morals. The way we’ve been going, it’ll be a miracle if some member
of the Texas Legislature doesn’t submit a bill requiring employees of carwashes
to be armed at all times. However, others might note that the weapon in this
case was an AR-15, the same type of military-style rifle that was used in the
Orlando shooting, the Newtown school shooting and the terrorist attack in San
Bernardino. It would seem as if the best way to cut down on mass shootings
would be by eliminating weapons that allow crazy people to rapidly fire off
endless rounds of bullets.
The possibility of banning assault
weapons like the AR-15 is most definitely not on the table in Congress,
although Hillary Clinton supports it, and has brought it up a lot since
Orlando. No, the current debate in Washington is over whether people on the
government’s terror watch list should be kept from purchasing arms.
The fact that even people who aren’t
allowed to get on a plane can buy a gun in this country is obviously insane.
Yet most of the Republicans in the House and the Senate regard changing the
status quo as an enormous lift. “I think you’re going too far here,” Senator
Lindsey Graham of South Carolina told the backers during one of the bill’s
pathetic trips to nowhere.
Since the Orlando shooter had actually
spent some time on the terror watch list, the pressure seems to be growing.
Trump says he’ll meet with the N.R.A. to talk over the matter. Perhaps, after
all this time, we’ll get some pathetically minor action. Then only apolitical
maniacs would have the opportunity to buy guns that can take out a roomful of
people in no time flat.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)