2012.06.22 DPRK Daily


Huge US, SKorea war games called warning to NKorea
AHN YOUNG-JOON, Associated Press, SAM KIM, Associated Press , Friday, June 22, 2012

Live-fire drills by the allies are fairly routine, but using the North's national flag as part of target practice is unusual — and will be seen as a provocation by Pyongyang, which has previously threatened war for what it called South Korean insults to the country's national symbols and leadership.

(LEAD) U.S. supercarrier to lead joint drills with S. Korea off Yellow Sea
kdh@yna.co.kr

SEOUL, June 22 (Yonhap) -- A nuclear-powered American aircraft carrier is in position off the west coast of South Korea to lead large-scale military exercises aimed at honing the two countries' joint capability to cope with North Korean aggression, Seoul officials said Friday, amid the North's saber-rattling.

   About 10 warships and submarines, including the George Washington Carrier Striker Group; 8,000 personnel; and hundreds of combat aircraft from the allies will take part in the three-day exercises from Saturday, said officials at Seoul's Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS).

About 28,500 U.S. troops are currently stationed in South Korea, a legacy of the Korean War.



Tokyo’s nuclear move worries neighbors
2012-06-22   By Shin Hyon-hee (heeshin@heraldm.com)

Japan’s recent amendment to its atomic energy law is rekindling fears about its formidable nuclear and missile technologies that experts say could quickly turn it into an atomic weapons power.

Its parliament on Wednesday passed the revision to the Atomic Energy Basic Act including “national security” among its goals. The revision was the first in 34 years.

“The safe use of atomic power is aimed at contributing to the protection of the people’s life, health and property, environmental conservation and national security,” the revised text reads.

In separate space agency legislation, the Diet also deleted a phrase that confined its activities to “peaceful purposes.” With the revision, the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency would be allowed to help develop spy and early warning satellites.

Despite political and legal constraints at home and abroad, the modified laws prompted anxiety that it could provide legal justification for Japan’s development of atomic weapons.

Tokyo is estimated to have up to 1,400 kilograms of highly enriched uranium and about 30 tons of plutonium extracted spent fuel from reprocessing facilities in Japan, the U.K. and France.

With its technological prowess, it has the potential to create roughly 6,000 Hiroshima-level bombs, physical scientists and nuclear experts say.

“Given its top-notch science technology and skills to transport and fire long-range rockets, Japan can make hundreds of warheads to mount on them in just six months to one year if it insists,” Son Yong-woo of the University of North Korean Studies told The Korea Herald.

Japan has built up its nuclear capability since the late 1950s while pursuing civilian space programs. It successfully put its first rocket into orbit in 1970 and mastered the nuclear fuel cycle in the 1980s ― from producing to loading for electricity, to disposing and reprocessing.

Japan’s hardliner politicians including some right-leaning Liberal Democratic Party lawmakers have been pushing to develop nuclear military capability, a call that is gaining greater backing in the face of China’s rapid emergence and North Korea’s constant saber-rattling.

Former prime minister Taro Aso often called for a national debate on whether Japan should have fission bombs. Tokyo’s outspoken Governor Shintaro Ishihara is one of the most prominent nuclear weapons advocates.

“All our enemies, China, North Korea and Russia ― all close neighbors ― have nuclear weapons. People talk about the cost and other things but the fact is that diplomatic bargaining power means nuclear weapons,” Ishihara said in a 2011 interview with The Independent.

The Atomic Energy Basic Act, a regulatory and institutional framework for its nuclear activities, laid a legal framework for Japan’s three non-nuclear principles in which it commits to “not possessing, producing or permitting the introduction of nuclear weapons.” It also formed the basis for the 1992 Joint Declaration on Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula, which North Korea is criticized for breaching.

The phrase of national security guarantee was not included in the initial proposal by the Cabinet but later inserted at the request of the LDP during parliamentary debate, The Tokyo Shimbun daily reported.

“We cannot rule out the possibility for practical military use. The amendment harmed the national interest and is a source of calamity,” said Committee of Seven for World Peace, founded by Hideki Yukawa, a physicist and Japan’s first Nobel Prize laureate who has been spearheading an international anti-nuclear crusade.

Tokyo officials downplayed such concerns and rebuffed any intention to divert nuclear power for military applications.

Any development of atomic devices would face obstacles. Tokyo is bound to the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, an international accord aimed at preventing the spread of atomic weapons and related technology.

“In principle, it would be not as easy for Japan to transform into a nuclear-armed country as mentioned in some news reports given its membership of the NPT,” Foreign Ministry deputy spokesperson Han Hye-jin told reporters in Seoul.

Japan was one of the last nations to sign the pact in 1970 and ratified it six years later only when the U.S. promised not to interfere with Tokyo’s acquisition of plutonium and pursuit of independent reprocessing capabilities at its commercial power plants.

Under a 1968 agreement, the U.S. provided the enriched uranium for Japanese reactors until it approved Tokyo’s reprocessing in Europe and own facilities and breeder reactors.

Public confidence in nuclear energy remains fragile in the aftermath of the Fukushima meltdown. Until the March 2011 disaster, Japan was the world’s third-largest nuclear power producer, after the U.S. and France, sourcing more than 30 percent of its electricity from 54 reactors.



China to Employ Another 20,000 N.Korean Workers

China has decided to allow 20,000 North Koreans to work in the Dandong area of Liaoning Province along the Apnok River separating it from North Korea. Earlier, China permitted another 20,000 North Koreans to work in the border cities of Tumen and Huchun in Jilin Province along the Duman River.

The 40,000 include many factory workers who lost their jobs when South Korea halted trade with North Korea in 2010 after the North's sinking of the Navy corvette Cheonan.

A source in Dandong said the Liaoning government and North Korea's Committee of Investment and Joint Venture signed an agreement in April authorizing the dispatch of of 20,000 North Koreans to Dandong.

Liaoning Province arrived at the number by assessing the needs of businesses in Dandong, the source added.

Under the agreement China will issue industrial training visas to 20,000 North Korean workers a year and pay them 1,300-1,700 yuan (W240,000-310,000) a month depending on the line of work. They will work in factories that manufacture clothes, food and IT products, or in mines.

The Economic Observer reported recently from Dandong that North Korea is pushing the dispatch of workers to China after they lost their jobs due to South Korean sanctions imposed when the North sank the Navy corvette Cheonan and shelled Yeonpyeong Island.
Already in January, Jilin Province signed an agreement with the North Korean committee to send 20,000 workers to Tumen and Hunchun. They started working in textile factories in Tumen last month.

The total number of North Korean workers in China is expected to rise to almost 50,000.  Some 8,000 are already working in North Korean restaurants and construction sites in Beijing and other parts of China.

Experts believe that Beijing agreed to import North Korean labor to help the North's moribund economy and new leader Kim Jong-un consolidate his grip on power. Their dispatch could undermine the effects of international sanctions against the North and delay possible reforms that could be triggered by worsening economic conditions there.

"It is not a violation of UN sanctions to hire North Korean workers, but the money they send back will end up in Kim Jong-un's coffers and delay the reforms and market opening that China desires," said a diplomatic source in Beijing.

North Korea dealt with South Korea's trade ban by drastically increasing exports of minerals, including iron ore and coal, to China and is now turning to labor export. Early this year, Kim reportedly issued an order to send as many workers as possible overseas, even at the risk of a certain number of defections.



Thai police arrest 19 North Korean refugees

BANGKOK (AFP) -- Police arrested 19 North Korean refugees in northern Thailand on Friday who asked to be sent to a "third country", most likely South Korea, officials said, and charged them with illegal entry.

The 11 women and eight men were taken into custody on a bank of the Mekong river in Chiang Rai province, some 780 kilometers (490 miles) north of Bangkok, after they disembarked from a boat, local police said.

An immigration officer confirmed the arrests, explaining they will be fined or jailed in lieu of money, and sent to a holding centre in Bangkok to wait to see if another country will accept them.

Almost all refugees escaping from North Korea make their way on foot to China but face repatriation if caught there.

Many then travel surreptitiously on what is nicknamed the "underground railway" to Southeast Asia and then seek resettlement in South Korea.

The Mekong river snakes through China's Yunnan province, Myanmar and Laos before reaching Thailand, where the refugees often disembark in the knowledge Thai authorities will not repatriate them to North Korea.

Some 22,000 North Koreans have defected from their impoverished and hunger-stricken homeland for South Korea since the 1950-1953 war, the vast majority in recent years



UN Sees China Behind North Korea Embargo Breach: Report

A UN panel has found Chinese involvement in more than half of the suspected violations of the North Korean arms and luxury goods embargoes, a Japanese media report said Friday.

The panel identified 38 instances in which banned goods have gone to or from North Korea. Of these, 21 have involved China, the Asahi Shimbun reported, citing unnamed sources.

The panel, created in 2009 after the North’s second nuclear test, reviewed the implementation of UN Security Council resolutions banning trade with North Korea in certain goods, the paper said.

In the majority of cases examined, Chinese ports served as transit points or Chinese firms were involved as intermediaries, it said, adding the panel’s report could be released as early as next week.

Of the 21 cases linked with China, two involved the export or import of items related to weapons of mass destruction or ballistic missiles, the Asahi said.

One of them was a 2007 attempted shipment from North Korea to Syria — via the Chinese port of Dalian — of electronic parts and metal plates to be used for ballistic missiles, the Asahi said.

The other was a 2010 shipment from Taiwan, via China, to North Korea of machine tools that could have military applications.

Six other cases involved the export or import of weapons. The remaining 13 cases were about imports of luxury goods to North Korea, the Asahi said.

Friday’s report followed earlier claims that a Chinese firm had exported four giant trucks capable of transporting and launching ballistic missiles in August.

The vehicles were likely those on display at the huge military display in April marking the centennial of the birth of the state’s founder Kim Il-Sung, the Asahi said.

However, the UN panel did not include this in the tally as an investigation into the claims is still ongoing, the paper said.

The panel issued an earlier report in November 2010, and said North Korea has established elaborate schemes to evade sanctions, including false labeling, illicit financial transactions and use of shell and front companies.

The 2010 report called on UN members to stay vigilant, but acknowledged implementation of the sanctions might be difficult