Syria Nuclear Probe Heads To U.N. Security Council
June 9, 2011
The U.N. nuclear watchdog voted Thursday to report Syria to the U.N. Security Council for violating its safeguard agreements, citing Syria's undeclared construction of a covert nuclear reactor and refusal to supply information.
The move by the International Atomic Energy Agency comes amid political protests in Syria, but Washington and its allies insist the timing of the recommendation has nothing to do with the crackdown on pro-democracy protesters and is separate from an effort by European nations to have the Security Council condemn Syrian President Bashar Assad's regime.
"The resolution is a necessary and appropriate step in light of the troubling findings in the IAEA's latest report, including Syria's refusal of the last three years to cooperate with the investigation," Glyn Davis, the chief U.S. envoy, to the IAEA told reporters after the vote.
Ministers of the IAEA's 35 governing members have been meeting since Monday to discuss a raft of issues ranging from the disaster at Japan's Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant to a lack of satisfactory cooperation from member states, including Syria and Iran.
Although the vote on taking action against Syria passed, it proved divisive. Seventeen members voted in favor, while six opposed the measure, based on the findings of IAEA chief Yukiya Amano. However, 11 nations abstained, meaning they did not contribute to the tally. One member was absent from the vote.
China and Russia voted against the recommendation, meaning it could face stiff opposition in the U.N. Security Council, where those nations hold veto power.
Before the vote, the Russians called the referral "untimely and not objective." They said the evidence against Syria was hypothetical and based on "possible alleged insufficiencies."
Indeed, the recommendation is the first from the IAEA that was based on an interpretation of evidence gathered against Syria.
But Olli Heinonen, a former senior IAEA official, said the action was necessary to protect the agency's credibility.
"I see it as an erosion in the verification scheme because here we have a partner who doesn't cooperate with the IAEA and the IAEA doesn't use all the tools and means at its disposal," he said.
Amano acknowledged that while the agency did not have "absolute proof," it was solid enough to justify taking action against Damascus. He said that Syria should have declared its Dair Alzour site, which was destroyed by Israeli warplanes in 2007, but was believed to have been capable of producing plutonium for possible use in nuclear weapons.
"The agency has come to the conclusion that it is very likely that the building destroyed at the Dair Alzour site was a nuclear reactor which should have been declared to the agency," Amano said earlier this week. "This is the best assessment of the agency based on all the information in its possession."
Since 2008, the IAEA has been frustrated in repeated attempts to follow up on further evidence regarding the site.
"Syria's apparent attempt at constructing a secret, undeclared plutonium production reactor ... represents one of the most serious safeguards violations possible," Davis said.
He went on to accuse Syria of "choosing to actively hinder the investigation by denying access, providing incomplete and misleading information, sanitizing multiple locations, and refusing to respond substantively to the agency's requests for further information and access."
Syria's ambassador called Thursday's vote regrettable, but pledged full cooperation with the agency.
In a separate report on Iran, Amano cited fresh information acquired by the agency that indicated a "possible military dimension" to Iran's nuclear program.
Iran's ambassador to the IAEA, Ali Asghar Soltanieh, called the report "not balanced and factual," and went on to insist that Amano was "not doing his job."
Iran announced Wednesday that it would triple its output of enriched uranium at a higher level than is needed for nuclear fuel near 20 percent by installing more efficient centrifuges.
Davis called that move "brazen" and told the board the agency's admission that it knows ever less about Iran's enrichment activities is "deeply troubling."
Together with China, France, Germany, Russia and the United Kingdom, the U.S. called on Tehran to "cooperate fully with the agency" and uphold its agreements.
Iran insists its nuclear program is purely civilian, yet steps such as the enrichment are moving it closer to a weapons capacity.
We will not suspend any of our nuclear activities, including enrichment," Soltanieh said.
Tehran is already under four rounds of U.N. Security Council sanctions over its refusal to halt enrichment. The IAEA did not recommend any fresh action at this week's meeting.
NPR's Mike Shuster contributed to this report, which includes material from The Associated Press
=================================================
June 9, 2011 ; White House Press Releases
Statement by the Press Secretary on the IAEA Board of Governors Resolution on Syria
Today's decision by the IAEA Board of Governors that Syria violated its international nonproliferation obligations marks a significant action by the international community to uphold the nonproliferation rules of the road. As the IAEA reports, with assistance from North Korea, Syria attempted to build a secret nuclear reactor capable of producing large amounts of nuclear weapons-usable plutonium, but with no apparent legitimate civilian purpose. Syria has stonewalled and obstructed the efforts of the IAEA to investigate the nuclear reactor for years, refusing to provide access to associated sites, personnel and documents in violation of Syria's freely-accepted legal obligations. With this resolution, the Board has referred Syria to the UN Security Council for further deliberation, consistent with the Board's mandate and authorities when confronted with noncompliance.
The United States remains determined to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons. We will work with partners and allies around the world to stand together to insist that every country meet its responsibilities or be held accountable for its actions.
