Showing posts with label Chad. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Chad. Show all posts

Senegal Told to Prosecute Ex-President of Chad (ICJ Judgment)


Senegal Told to Prosecute Ex-President of Chad (ICJ Judgment)
July 20, 2012   By MARLISE SIMONS

PARIS — The International Court of Justice on Friday ordered Senegal to prosecute the former president of Chad, Hissène Habré, who has lived comfortably for two decades in Senegal despite indictments in connection with political killings, torture and a host of other brutalities.

The court decision, which could affect exiled leaders in other countries, found that Senegal had breached the 1984 Convention Against Torture by ignoring charges against Mr. Habré. The ruling ordered the Senegalese authorities either to prosecute him “without further delay” or to extradite him for trial elsewhere.

In Senegal, the government sent extra security to Mr. Habré’s luxury villa on the outskirts of Dakar, the capital, where he has lived undisturbed since he fled a rebellion at home in 1990.

His fearsome rule, from 1982 to 1990, has been largely forgotten in North Africa, overtaken by other strongmen and conflicts.

If a trial does go ahead in Senegal, it will be the first time the president of one country is tried before in another country’s (domestic) court on charges of crimes committed at home, officials said.  Other heads of state who have been prosecuted have appeared before international courts or tribunals.

Justice Minister Aminata Touré, reached by telephone in Dakar, said Senegal would abide by the court’s order.

He would be tried under Senegalese law by a panel of local and African judges set up in agreement with the African Union, an arrangement Ms. Touré called “a novelty in international law.”

Neither Mr. Habré nor his lawyer could be reached for comment, but his comfortable exile may be coming to an end. Although Chad is among the world’s poorest nations, Mr. Habre is said to have acquired a sizable fortune. The Chad Truth Commission said in 1992 that even during the final days of his rule, he stole more than $11 million from the country’s treasury and central bank.

Mr. Habré came to power reportedly backed by covert support from the United States, during the Reagan administration, and other Western countries that wanted a counterweight in Chad to its troublemaking neighbor, Libya, at the time under the leadership of Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi. The truth commission said Mr. Habré’s government had killed up to 40,000 opponents and tortured many others.

A court in Chad has sentenced him to death in absentia, and courts in Belgium and Senegal have sentenced him for crimes against humanity, including torture, but Senegalese politicians presented numerous obstacles to his prosecution. It was Belgium that filed the case against Senegal at the court in The Hague, arguing that he should either be tried in Senegal or extradited to Belgium. It denounced Senegal for turning down four Belgian extradition requests.


Antigone, jus cogens and the International Court of Justice   July 22, 2012

Friday’s judgment of the International Court of Justice says:

99. In the Court’s opinion, the prohibition of torture is part of customary international law and it has become a peremptory norm (jus cogens).
That prohibition is grounded in a widespread international practice and on the opinio juris of States. It appears in numerous international instruments of universal application (in particular the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 1948, the 1949 Geneva Conventions for the protection of war victims; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights of 1966; General Assembly resolution 3452/30 of 9 December 1975 on the Protection of All Persons from Being Subjected to Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment), and it has been introduced into the domestic law of almost all States; finally, acts of torture are regularly denounced within national and international fora.

Is Chad really under an obligation to arrest Bashir?

Is Chad really under an obligation to arrest Bashir?
July 21, 2010

The news today has been filled with reports about the visit of President of Sudan, Omar Bashir, to Chad, and calls for Chad, which is a State Party to the ICC to arrest him.  Beyond any discussion of the political opportunity of such an act, every commentary seems to take for granted that Chad is under legal obligation to do so.

CNN has a "Court official" (probably OTP...) on the record saying that:
Chad is legally obliged to arrest Omar al-Bashir and hand him over to the International Criminal Court.
According to Human Rights Watch:
Chad should not flout its obligations to arrest al-Bashir if he enters Chad. 
Same tune at Amnesty International:
If it were not to arrest him, Chad would violate its obligations under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, which it ratified in November 2006.

 I'm not sure that's actually true. Sure, the Statute, at Article 86 provides that (my emphasis):
States Parties shall, in accordance with the provisions of this Statute, cooperate fully with the Court in its investigation and prosecution of crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court.

However, "in accordance with the provisions of the Statute", there is in fact no automatic obligation to cooperate in relation to the execution of an arrest warrant.  Indeed, Article 89 provides that the Court must make a request for cooperation to a State. The request must contain specific information outlined in Article 91 (such as a copy of the arrest warrant). Only then does the Statute provide (Article 89(1)) that (my emphasis):

States Parties shall, in accordance with the provisions of this Part and the procedure under their national law, comply with requests for arrest and surrender.

To my knowledge, there hasn't been such a request.

Second of all, even if the ICC had made a request for cooperation, the fact that Sudan is not a State Party can trigger the application of Article 98(1), according to which:

The Court may not proceed with a request for surrender or assistance which would require the requested State to act inconsistently with its obligations under international law with respect to the State or diplomatic immunity of a person or property of a third State, unless the Court can first obtain the cooperation of that third State for the waiver of the immunity.

It's arguable that Bashir, as an acting head of State, does benefit from diplomatic immunity, in application of the ICJ Arrest Warrant  Case (for a discussion of the immunity question in the Bashir case, see here). If that were the case, not only would Chad not be under an obligation to cooperate, but the request itself would be contrary to the Statute.

So, all in all it's far less obvious than claimed, that Chad is in fact under an automatic obligation to arrest and surrender Bashir. Of course, in a week where the Prosecutor himself has publicly considered that the issuance of an arrest warrant is proof of guilt (See commentaries of this by William Schabas and Kevin John Heller), one stops being surprised by poor legal argumentation...

-, - - - - - - - - - -, - - - - - - - - - -, - - - - - - - - -
-, - - - - - - - - - -, - - - - - - - - -
-, - - - - - - - - -
DO
Regarding the argument that Bashir might benefit from diplomatic immunity (head of state immunity, or immunities rationae personae),
The question presented here is whether Chad is obligated to arrest and transfer Bashir to the ICC.
-       Under domestic law
o    I don’t know about any legislation in Chad that implement the Rome Statute.
-       Under CIL
o    Head of state immunity (immunities rationae personae) and act of state alike constitute customary international law, though controversial as to what extent and under what circumstances the theories can be undermined or reduced
o    If Chad supports a strong form of head of state immunity, in other words, vehemently advocates sovereign equality and non-interference in domestic affairs, Bashir is likely to be immune from criminal jurisdiction of Chad
o    If Bashir is immune, Chad is not obligated to arrest and transfer him to the iCC  
o    The above analysis is in line with the Arrest Warrant case (Republic of Congo v. Belgium) that upheld immunity of foreign minister to the criminal jurisdiction of foreign domestic court  
-       Under treaty
o    Under Rome Statute, as the author pointed out, it depends on how to interpret art.86 and art. 89
§  my suspicion is that once the OTP issue arrest warrant, states parties are under obligation to cooperate with it, whether the OTP or the ICC issues additional request, because the intention of the OTP was made clear by the arrest warrant    
o   
§  If Darfur situation were brought by state referral or prosecutor (OTP proprio motu), and Bashir were entitled to immunity in criminal jurisdiction of Chad,, the ICC may not request Chad to arrest and transfer him to the ICC, because it would be inconsistent with international law, i.e., immunity
·         Sudan is not state party to the Rome Statute. Art. 98 is meant to benefit, at least, non-state party   
§  However, Darfur situation was brought to the ICC by UNSC referral. All UN member states are obligate to carry out UNSC decision. (art. 25 of the UN Charter) Chad is under obligation to arrest and transfer Bashir to the ICC pursuant to art. 25 of UN Charter.