Showing posts with label S.E. Benefit Corp. Show all posts
Showing posts with label S.E. Benefit Corp. Show all posts

Benefit corporation legal structure utilized by companies focused on renewable energy


Benefit corporation legal structure utilized by companies focused on renewable energy
Foley & Lardner LLP,  Laura J. Neumeister,  USA  October 1 2012

Socially and environmentally-minded entrepreneurs who want to address societal problems through a corporate structure have a relatively new legal structure available to them. “Benefit corporations” are a new class of corporations that (1) voluntarily create a material positive impact on society, their employees and the environment, (2) expand the traditional fiduciary duty to require consideration of financial and non-financial interests when making decisions, and (3) report on their overall social and environmental performance using recognized third-party standards. In short, these are entities that operate as traditional corporations, but are accountable to the triple bottom line (i.e., people, planet, profit). 

(DO- (1) mission, (2) fiduciary duty, (3) audit) 

While the majority of states have passed constituency statutes, or statutes that allow directors to consider non-shareholder interests when making decisions, advocates of the benefit corporation structure claim this permissive structure does not go far enough in advancing societal and environmental goals. Eleven states have now passed benefit corporation legislation, with Illinois and Louisiana passing legislation as recently as summer 2012. Other states that recognize the corporate structure include California, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, South Carolina, Vermont, and Virginia. Washington State has a similar law for special purpose corporations, and is debatably on this list as well.

Benefit corporations must publish an annual public benefit report that includes an assessment of their overall social and environmental performance against a third-party standard. This allows the corporation, its directors, its shareholders, and the public to determine whether the benefit corporation is meeting its statutory requirement of creating a material positive impact on society and the environment. A third-party standard is a standard for defining, reporting, and assessing overall corporate, social, and environmental performance that is comprehensive, independent, credible, and transparent. Benefit corporation legislation does not require any particular third-party standard to be adopted in preparing an annual benefit report, and the government has no role in determining the sufficiency of such standards.

This movement has been largely encouraged by B Lab, a nonprofit organization that certifies benefit corporations having a high overall standard of social and environmental performance. These certified entities are referred to as “Certified B Corporations” or “B Corps” and should not be confused with the legal distinction “benefit corporation.”

Newly formed and existing corporations can elect to become benefit corporations. A corporation may make this election in order to establish a clear mission that survives change of management or ownership. Furthermore, holding the benefit corporation distinction can help differentiate a company to investors and the public during this era when branding as green or responsible is popular.

(DO- Benefit Corporation gives a cover or provides excuse for directors to fall down on the job)
  
As mentioned above as an additional advantage, benefit corporation directors are protected when basing decisions on non-financial interests. While this last point is touted by advocates as a benefit, some critics have argued that this corporate form offers another way for directors who fall down on the job to escape liability by pointing to “social benefits” as their ill-defined guideposts. Either side of the argument would agree, however, that this protection allows for a different type of decision-making.
Although benefit corporations encompass a broad array of missions — from providing chemical-free makeup to assisting in addiction recovery — this corporate form is being utilized by a variety of green energy companies and companies with green energy clients. Examples include:

  • Solar Works: This private company in Sonoma, California, provides energy-efficient solutions that conserve natural resources and promote individual and community self-reliance by offering in-house design and installation of on-grid and off-grid PV systems
  • SunCommon: This company’s purpose is to increase solar energy production in Vermont by eliminating upfront costs and charging a monthly fee that is the same or less than what Vermonters are currently paying their utility for electricity
  • Thinkshift Communications: This California company creates strategic communications, planning, publications, and branding for sustainability-oriented enterprises
  • Ethical Electric Benefit Co.: This Maryland company, set to launch in 2012, will offer clean energy from solar and wind sources to residential customers
  • Clean Currents LLC: With Maryland being the only state allowing limited liability companies (LLC) to elect a benefit structure, this LLC sells green power to residential and commercial customers in the Mid-Atlantic, with solar and wind power options

Maryland Passes 'Benefit Corp.' Law for Social Entrepreneurs


Maryland Passes 'Benefit Corp.' Law for Social Entrepreneurs
Posted by: John Tozzi on April 13, 2010

Maryland today became the first state to legally create a new corporate form known as a “benefit corporation” that will let social entrepreneurs codify their missions in their corporate charters.

(DO- difference b/w L3C and B-Corp ?)

The law is modeled on proposals by B-Lab, a Berwyn, Pa.-nonprofit that certifies socially responsible companies. The law lets entrepreneurs commit their for-profit ventures to a specific public good, and requires them to report on contributions to that goal and submit to auditing of their impact. Having official “benefit corporation” status allows entrepreneurs to consider stakeholders like employees, communities, or the environment in business decisions. Under existing corporate law, company directors can face lawsuits if considering outside stakeholders is seen to damage the financial interest of shareholders.


We wrote nearly a year ago on the difficulty social entrepreneurs have fitting their hybrid missions of making money and doing good into existing corporate forms. The tangled arrangements they get into (nonprofits controlling for-profits, etc.) can be costly to set up and limit their ability to raise money from outside investors. Adopting the “benefit corporation” form signals that our economic institutions — in this case the laws that govern corporations — are catching up with the growing interest in the social enterprise sector. (This was one of two big ideas on my radar this year.) “If you care about accelerating the development of this emerging marketplace, the first step is providing the legal infrastructure,” Jay Coen Gilbert, one of the co-founders of B-Lab, told me last week.

He says the new legal designation could unlock new capital for social ventures from investors who want to park their money in mission-driven companies. “I think it’s becoming increasingly not only acceptable but sought after by mainstream investors,” Gilbert says.

Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley, a Democrat, signed the bill today, along with other bills at the end of Maryland’s legislative session. The bill, sponsored by Democratic state Sen. Jamie Raskin, passed Maryland’s Senate unanimously and passed the House by a vote of 135-5.

A similar proposal is pending in Vermont. California lawmakers are considering related legislation to allow “flexible purpose corporations” that would let companies protect their social missions, without the affirmative requirements that the “benefit corporation” law puts in place.


The Capital Law Firm, PLLC
The Maryland Benefit Corporation Act