2010 Nuclear Security Summit National Commitment Implementation:


2010 Nuclear Security Summit National Commitment Implementation: Steps in the Fight Against Nuclear Terrorism
US-KOREA INSTITUTE AT SAIS
Michelle Cann
March 2012

Reviewing, advancing, and building on the progress that countries have made implementing these commitments are among the main objectives of the second summit to be held in Seoul, Republic of Korea in March 2012

At the 2012 summit, countries are expected to again issue additional, voluntary national statements (called “house gifts” by summit planners), and some may join together to offer regional or multilateral commitments (“gift baskets”). In advance of the Seoul Summit, this paper provides an overview of the steps that countries have taken to implement the voluntary, national commitments detailed in the 2010 White House highlights document and the US national statement

but many were facilitated by the momentum created by the NSS process. (2010 Washington Nuclear Security Summit (NSS))

In short, countries have made commendable progress implementing their national commitments from the 2010 summit … However, it is also worth noting that summit participants have been unable to agree on a common format for tracking and reporting on their implementation of the 2010 summit consensus document and national
commitments.

a common tracking and reporting format would provide a more comprehensive and transparent picture of efforts to live up to the commitments made at the 2010 summit and, more broadly, the state of the global nuclear material security regime 
(DO- comprehensive, transparent, and consistent across countries and evenly in each area at domestic level)

In short, an accurate assessment of how states have lived up to their summit commitments requires an evaluation of the full scope of principles and objectives discussed at the summit.

Why?

While nuclear security may be a national responsibility, deficiencies in one state’s system can have international ramifications
largely nationally-focused and without binding international standards or reporting mechanisms
Reporting at the summit could also feed into the work of other international initiatives working to prevent nuclear terrorism through collaboration, such as the Global Initiative to Combat Nuclear Terrorism (GICNT), G-8 Global Partnership against the Spread of Weapons and Materials of Mass Destruction (Global Partnership), and the 1540 Committee.
it is difficult to see how states will be able to credibly and comprehensively demonstrate their achievements (DO- verification)
the difficulty of retroactively assessing progress without establishing a common tracking format

This report is another nongovernmental effort to provide transparency in tracking the actions taken by countries to improve their nuclear material security but its scope is limited to 2010 NSS national commitments.

Research results have been organized into the following nine categories:
1. International Conventions
2. Removing and Securing HEU and Plutonium
3. Reactor Conversions and Shutdowns
4. New IAEA Cooperation
5. New Centers, Conferences, and Training Support
6. New National Laws
7. Global Initiative to Combat Nuclear Terrorism
8. Preventing Nuclear Smuggling
9. G-8 Global Partnership


1. International Conventions
International Convention for the Suppression of Acts of Nuclear Terrorism (ICSANT),
Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material (CPPNM),
The CPPNM is the only legally binding international instrument with physical protection requirements for nuclear materials

2. Removing and Securing HEU and Plutonium
the use and management of nuclear materials and facilities
consolidation of storage sites and removal and disposition of fissile materials no longer in use
Chile completed its national commitment to eliminate all 18 kg of HEU from the country ahead of the Washington.  The Chilean operation was particularly challenging due to an 8.8 magnitude earthquake off its coast during the shipment preparations on February 27

3. Reactor Conversions and Shutdowns
the conversion of HEU-fueled reactors to LEU in the communiqué and work plan as part of efforts to minimize the use of HEU
HEU and separated plutonium are particularly sensitive materials
Russia fulfilled its national commitment to end plutonium production by shutting down the ADE-2 reactor in Zheleznogorsk

4. New IAEA Cooperation
The essential role that the IAEA plays in advancing nuclear security .. the valuable services and guidance materials the agency offers

5. New Centers, Conferences, and Training Support
the importance of the human dimension of nuclear security. They describe the need for continuing education and for the sharing of best practices among knowledgeable peers.

6. New National Laws
enforce effective national laws and regulations to keep materials secure as well as to criminalize any misuse or misconduct

7. Global Initiative to Combat Nuclear Terrorism

8. Preventing Nuclear Smuggling


9. G-8 Global Partnership