Kony 2012 - Adrian Hong


Greater Awareness Is Good

=======================

DO- that author while closing by saying that “the enormous energy spent on dissecting or criticizing the organization or the film can be better spent on trying to aid or improve the efforts of these activists, and, most important, ending the crisis,” the gist of his opinion is criticism.

I simply don’t know the Invisible Children, the maker of the film, the Kony 2012 is so naïve as to truly believe that the April Action resolves all. No reference to the fact “Change is never easy” does not necessarily mean it is not aware of the fact.

Just want to remind that it is only 30 minutes video clip, not State of the Union Address.

What Adrian Hong says is all true. No objection at all. But does it help to stop Kony who, as we speak now, must be doing something that abhors us?   

What mainstream media is doing in response to Kony 2012 is raising concern, rather than educating people on Kony.  Assuming the US send its troop, it will be not gonna be easy at all, do not forget Mogadishu Black Hawk down, which led the US to the aversion to boots on the ground.

To me, the first step to be taken is intelligence. It is believed to be a vast jungle area with which the US or NATO or UN peacekeeping operation have no considerable military experience. Intelligence must precede all actions, for which unmanned aerial vehicle is the right device to use. 

Send drone to the jungle !!

ICC case against Kony, and arrest warrant  


======================

Adrian Hong is the managing director of Pegasus Strategies, a strategic advisory group. He has worked on human rights and refugee issues worldwide, advising dissidents, activists and advocates. He is also a TED senior fellow and is on Twitter.
UPDATED MARCH 10, 2012, 1:37 PM

“Kony 2012” and Invisible Children, the organization behind it, are based on a single core belief – the idea that if only enough people know and care about the atrocities Joseph Kony is committing, the world will act and stop him.

Therein lies the fatal flaw of an otherwise well-executed effort at raising awareness and motivating action. Mass awareness does not equal change. Enlightening millions worldwide did not stop Darfur. It has not saved Tibet. It has not freed North Korea. It will not stop Joseph Kony.

A danger "Kony 2012" presents is in the assumption that a simple, often symbolic act or two is enough to cause real change. Many have been similarly let down by inflated expectations of wholesale change in the streets of Tahrir Square for example, or anticipated "transformative" elections closer to home. Real, lasting change requires — after those first brilliant and effusive moments of impassioned action — sustained, challenging work.

"Kony 2012" has also been slammed with accusations of a "white man's burden" undertone. There are real issues with colonialism and imperialism in the aid, development and human rights world, but they should not be used to rule out any action by "outsiders" at all. Arguments against international intervention or assistance without fail will come from those who are not at the moment victims themselves. One will never find a man, woman or child unjustly imprisoned, tortured or enslaved demand that their rescuers be of their own race, creed or tribe. Certainly genocide and atrocity survivors will attest to this.

The film does oversimplify the crisis, and facts may not be perfectly accurate. But perhaps the only fact that counts is this one: Joseph Kony and his army exploit, abuse and inflict great suffering on those around them, especially children, the most vulnerable. What does it matter precisely where or how it is happening? It is happening, it is wrong, and it must be stopped.

(DO- without oversimplification, the film would have end up running the risk of being a documentary, which is not likely to attract large audience.  To appeal to as large audience as possible, advocacy tends to use simplified rhetoric, walking the fine line between misleading and characterization.)   

Regardless of the film’s missteps, it is a well-intentioned effort in good faith. The people at Invisible Children seem to genuinely want an end to the injustice of Joseph Kony, and a better world. Tens of millions have so far been educated about a terrible crisis, and many among them may have found a spark to go on to be champions for positive change in their own ways.

Change is never easy. Human rights crises are our world's most difficult (and important) challenges. But the enormous energy spent on dissecting or criticizing the organization or the film can be better spent on trying to aid or improve the efforts of these activists, and, most important, ending the crisis.