in Argentina's expropriation of assets of the Spanish oil firm, a glimpse of Latin America's left


In Argentina's Oil, A Glimpse Of Latin America's Left
by JUAN FORERO, April 22, 2012

Argentine President Cristina Fernandez holds up a petroleum sample as she announces plans for her government to nationalize a giant oil company that is largely owned by a private Spanish company. Behind her is an image of the country's former first lady, Eva Peron.

Just the arrival of Argentine President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner prompted supporters in her Peronist movement to break into chants last Monday. The event, choreographed to feel momentous, was at the presidential palace. Fernandez de Kirchner announced plans to expropriate assets of the Spanish oil firm Repsol in Argentina.

Through a window, television viewers could see a huge image of Evita Peron, the famous 1950s-era populist whose presence is deeply felt in today's government.

"Companies that are here with foreign stockholders are Argentine companies," Fernandez de Kirchner said. "Let no one forget that."

The president's plans, likely to be easily approved by Congress this week, delighted the left in her country and were condemned by the Europeans and criticized by the U.S. State Department.

The move also provides a peek at what the left might look like in Latin America, just as Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez and the Castros in Cuba appear to be fading.

Emerging Leaders

For decades, the radical left was embodied in Fidel Castro. His fiery speeches inspired leftists across the region after his 1959 seizure of power.

Then came Chavez, who transformed Venezuela into a Socialist state over 13 years. Now, though, Chavez is stricken with cancer and has faded as he seeks treatments in Cuba.

Castro has been replaced by his brother, Raul, who is five years younger but still 80.

Sooner or later, both Cuba and Venezuela will have new leaders. This means the de facto emergence of another set of leftist populists: Ecuador's Rafael Correa, Bolivia's Evo Morales, Nicaragua's Daniel Ortega and, of course, Fernandez de Kirchner.

These populists are known for intervening in their economies and spending heavily, thanks to a recent bonanza in crop and resource prices.

Money Crunch

At the moment, it's Argentina's expropriation of Repsol affiliate YPF that is getting attention across the region, making Fernandez de Kirchner a champion to some on the left.

"Clearly, YPF is the biggest, most symbolic nationalization that we've seen in Latin America in decades," says Arturo Porzecanski, an economist at American University in Washington.

Fernandez de Kirchner has also used Central Bank funds and a nationalized pension system to shore up finances. Porzecanski says such steps reflect the serious money crunch Argentina faces — and it's not just in Argentina.

"Those countries whose governments have spent all the bonanza and then some are really scrambling for funds," he says. "Whereas other countries that have managed the bonanza more responsibly — whether it's a Colombia or a Peru or a Chile or a Brazil — they're in a much more viable, sustainable position."

Those other countries are either center-left, such as Brazil, or center-right, like Chile. They are all market-friendly and have drawn record levels of foreign investment and diversified their economies — while some of the other countries have begun to decay.

'A Sense Of Stagnation'

Michael Shifter, president of the Inter-American Dialogue in Washington, D.C., says measures such as the YPF takeover or Ecuador's recent efforts to restrict the press are more the exception than the rule. He says they reflect a populist option that is not viable for most countries.

"There's no sense of moving toward fulfilling some alternative vision and some utopian ideal," Shifter says. "There's a sense of stagnation and just trying to hold on to power, which is really not a very attractive leftist project."

He also says that, in the long term, it's just not sustainable.


Spain's Clash With Argentina Over An Oil Company
April 18, 2012

Thanks for joining us. I'm Diane Rehm. Argentina is facing widespread criticism for plans to nationalize oil company YPF. The Spanish energy giant Repsol was the controlling shareholder. This has become a diplomatic crisis. Joining me to talk about the standoff between Spain and Argentina and the implications for Europe and the U.S. economy: Jacob Funk Kirkegaard of the Peterson Institute for International Economics, Sophia Aguirre of the Catholic University of America, Paul Isbell of the Inter-American Dialogue and Daniel Kauffman of the Brookings Institution.

ISBELL
why did this have to happen right now, particularly from the Spanish point of view?
Spain is in the -- probably the toughest economic and financial situation that they've been in. enraging piece of news flow, which is coming on top of all kinds of bad news in Spain.  

AGUIRRE
at Argentina, first is we are taking another step towards Chavez-style of government, .. third, this would deter even more the investment that Argentina so badly needs today, foreign investment

KIRKEGAARD
Repsol is going to lose somewhere between 10 or $11 billion in market value, and that may spill over to some of the Spanish banks

KAUFMANN
this (expropriation) was for political experience (expediency?) reason because it's a populist move, and that resonates with many Argentineans today. But, secondly, she did it for desperate economic and financial reasons. it's a historical trend in Argentina that when they run into real problems with the budget and they need to fund welfare programs, they expropriate something -- a few years ago was a pension scheme and, now, it's the oil company. So in the very short term, it may help her. But it's a disastrous move for Argentinean prospects in the future.
Argentina used to be, in the 1920s, the seventh richest country in the world. Today, it's about 50, in terms of their regulatory environment -- this is not just now -- in terms of rule of law, in terms of corruption -- about 150 out of 200 countries -- in terms of doing business, any indicator we use.
We can call it increasing Chavetization or Venezualization of Argentina

AGUIRRE
In Argentina today, people make more money getting subsidies from the government than working themselves. So all these trends .. is what is undermining the economy, the market and protectionist policies that does not make Argentina more competitive but make them fall farther and farther in time.

KIRKEGAARD
bad diplomatic outlook that this creates for Argentina. the Argentina president was snubbed at the latest inter-American summit where nobody wanted to talk about the Falklands claim that she has recently made.  to restate the Argentinean claim of sovereignty over the now British Falkland Islands, which goes back to the early 1980s
Argentina is still a member of the G-20. President Kirchner will have to go to Mexico for the summit in June. Maybe Argentina will face a new degree of diplomatic isolation at the G-20 as well,, as a result of something like this.

REHM
you talk about the diplomatic consequences. We have repeatedly reached out to the embassy of Argentina, inviting them to participate this morning. They declined.

ISBELL
Repsol YPF was one of the companies that discovered shale gas and shale oil in Argentina.

KAUFMANN
There'll be enormous pressure from the international community for some type of compensation, although it's very unlikely for political reasons that the expropriation, the nationalization itself will be reversed. So there'll be a question of what's a fair level of compensation. It will never satisfy Repsol and so on.
this is not a huge blow at the macroeconomic level for Spain. But, it's a major political issue,
it's a worrisome trend about some countries in the world are going that route these days. Venezuela as being an extreme case, but Argentina is going that route.

ISBELL
the question now does not appear to be geological scarcity in Argentina,
there have been major discoveries. Argentina is estimated now to have the third largest shale gas reserves, and there seems to be shale oil as well.
This is one of the reasons why the Falklands-Malvinas issue is back center stage because the Falkland Islands have begun allowing oil companies to come in to explore, and oil has been discovered in the northern basin

KIRKEGAARD
this broader, longer term trend of renationalization of national (natural?) resources, particularly, in the oil sector. we had Russia, and in Venezuela as well
But, very recently, Exxon Mobil, of all companies, have now engaged directly with a Russian company to develop the Arctic gas reserves. there is a willingness to engage now by many governments (with oil companies) that were previously perceived to be very nationalistic because they perceive that they need the kind of technology that these companies can bring

AGUIRRE
Mexico will be very happy. More investment will go to Mexico over to Argentina -- away from Argentina

KAUFMANN
The Pemex, (Mexico state-owned Petroleos Mexicanos) the Mexican oil producer has a stake for about 10 percent

Argentina used to attract about $10 billion a year in terms of foreign investment about eight years ago and so on. It's down to about two to $3 billion. this is before this happened.

KIRKEGAARD
the EU will line up very firmly behind the Spanish government on this issue also because the U.K. government actually has a similar longstanding feud with the Kirchner government.
it already has had some repercussions. The EU has canceled an upcoming trade meeting with the Argentinean government or postponed it, at least
any hopes for an EU-Mercosur Free Trade Agreement being restarted .. has died now
it's a little complicate because recently, the EU has actually acquired a legal right to act on international investment twists on behalf of member states.
an Argentinean-Spanish bilateral investment treaty, but  most likely going to be enforced by the EU in a court of arbitration, coming back to these negotiations about some kind of compensation. But it's going to be a very tricky legal issue

ISBELL
they (Spain) could start a full-blown trade war if they wished, but they won't.
the extreme vulnerability that Spaniards feel, particularly those in the government and particularly those in the top brass of Repsol who probably won't survive this incidence even if they would have been able to stay on under a new administration in Spain.

KIRKEGAARD
I don't think we should overdramatize the impact on the broader euro area effect on this.

KAUFMANN
(Argentina might back out of nationalizing the oil company?)  that would have a huge political cost for the president, Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner, who is enjoying enormous popularity internally from that move. So that's extremely unlikely

AGUIRRE
Brazil - a consistency of policy toward engaging in international markets, following a path that reflects the success of Chile, a successful story in spite of different political parties
Argentina has failed systemically on that, and instead have moved to Chavetization road.

ISBELL
Brazil, in the last 20 years, has establish not just credibility, but they've done it by consistency .. by staying in the line even though the markets weren't buying the argument until they were convinced.

KIRKEGAARD
the U.S. government is actually involved in a number of long-running disputes with the Argentinean government, both on issues related back to the Argentina default in 2001 as well as more recently where the Obama administration actually took a rather unprecedented move and have suspended Argentina
because of a dispute between American companies and the Argentinean government overcompensation in a similar investment type case, the Obama administration suspended Argentina from the so-called General System of Preferences, which is another way of saying that Argentina is going to lose a lot of trade preferences with its exports to the United States